It descends into chaos very, very quickly.” But I don’t think the law can accommodate individuals sidestepping secular law based on your own internal religious belief. As a Christian myself, I value him for his beliefs, and I pray for him. “It's not about Masterpiece Cakeshop, Mr. In May, he released a memoir, The Cost of My Faith, and she adds that the Masterpiece Cakeshop website is ”selling coffee mugs, hats, and t-shirts.” “Yeah… that cakeshop,” its merchandise reads, winking at the bakery’s notoriety.īut Scardina says the reprisals are worth it because of the necessity of upholding the principles at the center of the dispute.
#Cake shop 3 embed professional#
She was the subject of a Rush Limbaugh hit piece in 2019 referring to her as part of the “militant politicized gay community,” and her professional page has been bombarded with negative reviews.Īll the while, Scardina says that Phillips is “monetizing” his beliefs. This is the only interview she has given in the three years since she has filed the case, during which time she has received threatening letters and emails misgendering her. As the case continues to garner more media attention, she says misinformation has continued to spread. Scardina says she is pleased with the outcome of this week’s decision but admits that she feels somewhat conflicted. “It's clearly a constitutionally protected right, but it doesn't make them, as the Supreme Court said some 30 some years ago, a ‘little kingdom unto themselves,’ where their religious beliefs trump the laws that we all agree to abide by to live in this country.” “People’s religious beliefs are important,” McHugh tells them. They are being told, ‘No, you're not good enough. “These are just ordinary people going about their lives, trying to do the simple things that most of us take for granted. “They weren’t even activists, and neither is Autumn,” Greisen tells them.
#Cake shop 3 embed trial#
Attorney Paula Greisen described Scardina as a “very loving, generous, kind person” who is “not the picture that gets painted of her.” Greisen was also the lead trial lawyer representing Charlie Craig and David Mullins, the gay couple at the center of the 2018 Supreme Court case, and says that they, too, were falsely depicted as “crazy activists.” Scardina’s legal team denied that characterization of their client’s motives in bringing forward the lawsuit. “Radical activists and government officials are targeting artists like Jack because they won’t promote messages on marriage and sexuality that violate their core convictions.” “he activist even threatened to sue Jack again if the case is dismissed for any reason,” said ADF General Counsel Kristen Waggoner. We're not going to do this for you,’” says Greisen.
Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a right-wing law firm that also represented Phillips in his prior case before the Supreme Court, claimed in its statement that Scardina “demanded Jack create custom cakes in order to ‘test’ Jack and ‘correct the errors’ of his thinking.” Phillips’ legal team has already vowed to challenge the ruling, announcing plans to appeal in a Wednesday press release. In addition to finding in favor of Scardina’s claim, Jones slapped Phillips with a $500 fine, the highest possible amount under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, a sweeping 2008 law protecting LGBTQ+ individuals from prejudicial bias. Jones added that Masterpiece’s policy of serving Scardina until it became aware that she is a transgender woman is the “equivalent of a ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ rule.” “LGBT individuals would be entitled to equal service only to the extent they do not request goods that reflect their identity as LGBT individuals (or at least do not inform Defendants of that reflection),” he wrote.
0 kommentar(er)
